digraph unix {
Acl1 [color="#A80036",shape=record,style="rounded,filled",color="#A80036",fillcolor="#FEFECE",label=<{<TABLE
BGCOLOR="#FEFECE" BORDER="0" CELLBORDER="0"
CELLSPACING="0"><TR><TD><FONT POINT-SIZE="14"
COLOR="#000000">AAAAAA</FONT></TD></TR></TABLE>|}>];
Acl2 [color="#A80036",shape=record,style="rounded,filled",color="#A80036",fillcolor="#FEFECE",label=<{<TABLE
BGCOLOR="#FEFECE" BORDER="0" CELLBORDER="0"
CELLSPACING="0"><TR><TD><FONT POINT-SIZE="14"
COLOR="#000000">AAAAAA</FONT></TD></TR></TABLE>|}>];
Acl1 -> Acl2[label="label",minlen=0];
}
Comments: This is really a problem with the implementation of complex flat edges between adjacent nodes for record nodes. Basically, it is broken. The simplest example is
digraph unix {
Acl1 [
shape=record
label="{AAAAAA|}"
]
Acl2 [
shape=record
label="{AAAAAA|}"
]
Acl1 -> Acl2[label="label",minlen=0];
}
with output.
[erg]
The fix is partial, in that it still doesn't handle the case of
ports on the edges.
Owner: erg
Status: Fixed (5 Feb 2011)